Character discussions - Revision history

Hannele: /* Character Discussion */

2009-03-13T22:41:39Z

Character Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 13 March 2009
Line 22:		Line 22:
	Didn't see that Bert wants to play a thiefy character, so I'll be happy to play a sorcerer, which gives Delphine a chance to have a go at a tank (looking into battle sorcerer as I type). [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]		Didn't see that Bert wants to play a thiefy character, so I'll be happy to play a sorcerer, which gives Delphine a chance to have a go at a tank (looking into battle sorcerer as I type). [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]
	*Well, I would like to play a battle sorcerer, actually ;-), if Dave agrees, of course. How about a PAladin who's lost faith, or something like that? That could be interesting ;-) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 13:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)		*Well, I would like to play a battle sorcerer, actually ;-), if Dave agrees, of course. How about a PAladin who's lost faith, or something like that? That could be interesting ;-) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 13:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
			: I'll go for a Paladin of Freedom, then. [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]
	===DM's comments===		===DM's comments===

Notafish: /* Suggestions */

2009-01-27T13:09:59Z

Suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 27 January 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:: We can't all have Huerney's rolls ;-) [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]		:: We can't all have Huerney's rolls ;-) [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]
	Didn't see that Bert wants to play a thiefy character, so I'll be happy to play a sorcerer, which gives Delphine a chance to have a go at a tank (looking into battle sorcerer as I type). [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]		Didn't see that Bert wants to play a thiefy character, so I'll be happy to play a sorcerer, which gives Delphine a chance to have a go at a tank (looking into battle sorcerer as I type). [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]
			*Well, I would like to play a battle sorcerer, actually ;-), if Dave agrees, of course. How about a PAladin who's lost faith, or something like that? That could be interesting ;-) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 13:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

	===DM's comments===		===DM's comments===

Hannele: /* Character Discussion */

2009-01-26T21:51:47Z

Character Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 26 January 2009
Line 20:		Line 20:
	: Hannele - they're significantly better than Huerney's. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]		: Hannele - they're significantly better than Huerney's. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]
	:: We can't all have Huerney's rolls ;-) [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]		:: We can't all have Huerney's rolls ;-) [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]
			Didn't see that Bert wants to play a thiefy character, so I'll be happy to play a sorcerer, which gives Delphine a chance to have a go at a tank (looking into battle sorcerer as I type). [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]

	===DM's comments===		===DM's comments===

Hannele: /* Suggestions */

2009-01-26T21:44:28Z

Suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 26 January 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:

	: Hannele - they're significantly better than Huerney's. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]		: Hannele - they're significantly better than Huerney's. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]
			:: We can't all have Huerney's rolls ;-) [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]

	===DM's comments===		===DM's comments===
Line 28:		Line 29:
	* Thug gains 2 skill points per-level and only loses 1 feat.		* Thug gains 2 skill points per-level and only loses 1 feat.
	* I'll only allow the paladin if either a) it's a paladin of freedom, or b) you do not complain every time someone else wants to do something less than lawful. e.g., if your paladin character refuses to break into the crooked merchant's office to gather some intel I will frown a lot.		* I'll only allow the paladin if either a) it's a paladin of freedom, or b) you do not complain every time someone else wants to do something less than lawful. e.g., if your paladin character refuses to break into the crooked merchant's office to gather some intel I will frown a lot.
			: Even my lawful good paladin didn't nag about breaking and entering, so it can be done. [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]]

	Consider everyone's preferred choice we have:		Consider everyone's preferred choice we have:

Craig at 17:59, 26 January 2009

2009-01-26T17:59:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 26 January 2009
Line 40:		Line 40:
	:OK, what would you think of a battle sorcerer then? I'm thinking it can be good (and fun) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)		:OK, what would you think of a battle sorcerer then? I'm thinking it can be good (and fun) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
	:: A good compromise on your part, provided that you are happy. From the edit history this doesn't seem to be the case. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]		:: A good compromise on your part, provided that you are happy. From the edit history this doesn't seem to be the case. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]
	:: Dave, I'll probably reinvent Osred. Would you be happy for me to take Thaumaturgist as a prestige class later? [[User:Craig\|Craig]]

	==Analysis of past characters==		==Analysis of past characters==

Craig at 17:43, 26 January 2009

2009-01-26T17:43:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 26 January 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:

	:OK, what would you think of a battle sorcerer then? I'm thinking it can be good (and fun) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)		:OK, what would you think of a battle sorcerer then? I'm thinking it can be good (and fun) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
	:: A good compromise on your part, provided that you are happy. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]		:: A good compromise on your part, provided that you are happy. From the edit history this doesn't seem to be the case. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]
	:: Dave, I'll probably reinvent Osred. Would you be happy for me to take Thaumaturgist as a prestige class later? [[User:Craig\|Craig]]		:: Dave, I'll probably reinvent Osred. Would you be happy for me to take Thaumaturgist as a prestige class later? [[User:Craig\|Craig]]

Craig at 12:58, 26 January 2009

2009-01-26T12:58:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 26 January 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	* [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] - Fighter, [http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/classes/variantCharacterClasses.htm#sorcererVariantBattleSorcerer Battle Sorcerer] - I am happy to play any of these two, no preferred order, then [http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/classes/variantCharacterClasses.htm#fighterVariantThug thug]		* [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] - Fighter, [http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/classes/variantCharacterClasses.htm#sorcererVariantBattleSorcerer Battle Sorcerer] - I am happy to play any of these two, no preferred order, then [http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/classes/variantCharacterClasses.htm#fighterVariantThug thug]
	* [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]] - Paladin, Rogue. Don't mind too much what, but my stats were not too good, which would make playing a rogue that bit more difficult, especially at level 1.		* [[User:Hannele\|Hannele]] - Paladin, Rogue. Don't mind too much what, but my stats were not too good, which would make playing a rogue that bit more difficult, especially at level 1.

			: Hannele - they're significantly better than Huerney's. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]

	===DM's comments===		===DM's comments===
Line 23:		Line 25:

	* What's the fast healing variant of the druid? I don't have the PHB2.		* What's the fast healing variant of the druid? I don't have the PHB2.
			: Instead of instantaneous summon nature's ally, you can instead instantaneously use a spell to give everyone within 30 feet fast healing for 3 rounds. The amount of healing is equal to the level of the spell lost. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]
	* Thug gains 2 skill points per-level and only loses 1 feat.		* Thug gains 2 skill points per-level and only loses 1 feat.
	* I'll only allow the paladin if either a) it's a paladin of freedom, or b) you do not complain every time someone else wants to do something less than lawful. e.g., if your paladin character refuses to break into the crooked merchant's office to gather some intel I will frown a lot.		* I'll only allow the paladin if either a) it's a paladin of freedom, or b) you do not complain every time someone else wants to do something less than lawful. e.g., if your paladin character refuses to break into the crooked merchant's office to gather some intel I will frown a lot.
Line 36:		Line 39:

	:OK, what would you think of a battle sorcerer then? I'm thinking it can be good (and fun) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)		:OK, what would you think of a battle sorcerer then? I'm thinking it can be good (and fun) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
			:: A good compromise on your part, provided that you are happy. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]
			:: Dave, I'll probably reinvent Osred. Would you be happy for me to take Thaumaturgist as a prestige class later? [[User:Craig\|Craig]]

	==Analysis of past characters==		==Analysis of past characters==

Notafish: /* DM's comments */

2009-01-26T11:57:11Z

DM's comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 26 January 2009
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Clerics and paladins will need to a) invent a god or goddess, or b) be atheist.		Clerics and paladins will need to a) invent a god or goddess, or b) be atheist.

			:OK, what would you think of a battle sorcerer then? I'm thinking it can be good (and fun) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

	==Analysis of past characters==		==Analysis of past characters==

Notafish: /* DM's comments */ never mind, I want a true fighter ;)

2009-01-26T11:29:00Z

DM's comments: never mind, I want a true fighter ;)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:29, 26 January 2009
Line 32:		Line 32:
	* Hannele - Paladin (fighter, minor healing)		* Hannele - Paladin (fighter, minor healing)
	The only thing this selection lacks is the big DPS from a good arcane spell caster.		The only thing this selection lacks is the big DPS from a good arcane spell caster.

	:What do you think about a battle sorcerer? WOuld that throw some arcane in the pot? [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

	Clerics and paladins will need to a) invent a god or goddess, or b) be atheist.		Clerics and paladins will need to a) invent a god or goddess, or b) be atheist.

Notafish: /* DM's comments */

2009-01-26T11:16:19Z

DM's comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 26 January 2009
Line 33:		Line 33:
	The only thing this selection lacks is the big DPS from a good arcane spell caster.		The only thing this selection lacks is the big DPS from a good arcane spell caster.

	What do you think about a battle sorcerer? WOuld that throw some arcane in the pot? [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)		:What do you think about a battle sorcerer? WOuld that throw some arcane in the pot? [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

	Clerics and paladins will need to a) invent a god or goddess, or b) be atheist.		Clerics and paladins will need to a) invent a god or goddess, or b) be atheist.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 26 January 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:

	:OK, what would you think of a battle sorcerer then? I'm thinking it can be good (and fun) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)		:OK, what would you think of a battle sorcerer then? I'm thinking it can be good (and fun) [[User:Notafish\|Delphine]] 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
	:: A good compromise on your part, provided that you are happy. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]		:: A good compromise on your part, provided that you are happy. From the edit history this doesn't seem to be the case. [[User:Craig\|Craig]]
	:: Dave, I'll probably reinvent Osred. Would you be happy for me to take Thaumaturgist as a prestige class later? [[User:Craig\|Craig]]		:: Dave, I'll probably reinvent Osred. Would you be happy for me to take Thaumaturgist as a prestige class later? [[User:Craig\|Craig]]